Razer DeathAdder V2 X HyperSpeed, USB/Bluetooth

Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the DeathAdder V2 X Hyperspeed is no different from the Orochi V2 in many aspects. Once again, the user is given the option of either using an AA or AAA-battery, along with the choice between 2.4 GHz wireless and Bluetooth. No matter the choice, battery life will be strong, albeit around 14% worse than on the Orochi V2, which is due to the PAW3319 used on the DeathAdder V2 X Hyperspeed lacking some of the power-saving features of the Orochi's 3369. In terms of wireless performance, the DeathAdder V2 X Hyperspeed is a match, achieving a wireless motion delay of around 1.5 ms and flawless polling at 125 and 1000 Hz. The only flaw I could detect is 500 Hz not being entirely stable, which no doubt will swiftly be dealt with in a firmware update. Most curiously, even the degree of CPI deviation is the same as on the Orochi V2. Even though the 3319 essentially is a lower-cost 3369, real-world performance is by all means the same. Much like on the 3369, there is no added motion delay at the onset of motion, which otherwise is inherent to the 3311, as the 3319 is called in its non-Razer rendition. As a result, the response curve is linear, leading to a level of responsiveness very similar to that of the DeathAdder V2 Pro.